Resisting Responsibility in the Male Delinquent Subculture

To add a paper, Login.

In many societies today, increasingly people find it difficult to take direct responsibility for their deviant behaviors. When the deviant behavior has been legislated against and is defined as delinquent or criminal, people attempt to distance themselves from it and deny they played a part in its inception, execution or outcome. Ironically, this resisting of responsibility is seldom reflected in the media. In movies, television shows and novels, when malfeasance is discovered, the majority of the accused readily admit their wrongdoing through confession and admittance of guilt. As a result, the public feels a sense of satisfaction and a sense of closure. In real life, however, this is another matter. Elected officials, corporate executives, religious figures, community leaders, and private citizens generally deny their involvement in wrongdoing. Regardless of the crime, many defendants claim innocence, even when they are not, thus forcing society to go on the offensive to prove their guilt. It is fashionable, and actually expected by increasingly alienated members of society, to deny the allegations unconditionally, regardless of circumstances. This paper uses a sociological approach combining sociology, psychology and communications to explore the denial of responsibility in a specific population of incarcerated male juvenile delinquents aged 13-18. Each of the 50 boys included in the sample had been adjudicated delinquent; the allegations against him had been sustained. If he had been an adult, in a court of law he would have been found guilty of the charges against him. As the products of a culture that encourages the denial of responsibility, these delinquents are like everyone else; they continue to resist responsibility for their behaviors even while incarcerated. Thus, using qualitative interviews and staff accounts at a placement for delinquent and criminal juveniles, a typology of and various themes in the denial of responsibility are identified and examples of each are provided. Subsequently, four successful institutional techniques for dealing with the denial of responsibility are identified, explained and applied.

Keywords: Juvenile Delinquency, Denial of Responsibility, Guided Group Interaction, Delinquent Subcultures, Qualitative Research
Stream: Sociology, Geography
Presentation Type: Paper Presentation in English
Paper: A paper has not yet been submitted.

Dr. Sharon Kantorowski Davis

Professor of Sociology and Department Chair, Dept of Sociology & Anthropology, University of La Verne
La Verne, CA, USA

Sharon K. Davis, Ph. D., is a sociologist specializing in Criminology and Juvenile Delinquency. Using qualitative research methods she focuses on perpetrators and victims. Her articles include the denial of responsibility by incarcerated male delinquents, family influences on delinquent behaviors, and ethnic variations in the identification and use of role models. She has conducted case studies on organizational gender discrimination and content analyses of elements of popular culture. She travels extensively in Europe, Mexico, and Asia. She recently traveled to China and Tibet. She also traveled to Belfast, Northern Ireland as a participant in a seminar on the peace process in Northern Ireland. She speaks several languages.

Ref: I08P0314