Crossing Borders vs. Nationalism?
Started with classical social evolutionism, sociocultural evolution is both an active ideology and positive knowledge. In my opinion, a mix of the above two sides has become a ground that the wide range of theoretical and practical problems have been arising from. That “points at” such events as the collapse of the British Empire and Iraqi affairs. I view the mix as the rationalism’s dogmatism which automatically produces clashes of historical memories, cultural identities. Generally it creates a communications gap between the North and South, the West and East which is a dangerous alienation process too. So we should carefully distinguish among the sides. These historical, ideological and political issues are clearly reflected in a tendency of the literary process of the 19th-21st centuries which also might be considered as the major tendency of the one. In the paper, which is based by its method on comparative literature and interdisciplinarity, I would like to shed more light on the matter from the perspective of bridging the communications gap.
Keywords: traditional and modern societies, knowledge, myth, nationalism, universalism, progress
Mr. Giorgi Kankava
Research Scholar, The Scientific Department of Georgian Literature, The Shota Rustaveli Institute of Georgian Literature
Nationalism and Globalization in Conflict and Transition).
Interested in relations of the "traditional" and "modern" societies from a perspective of more security of the humans.
General view: there are not existed such problems in the world as we can not solve, but we may have less knowledge than it is needed them to be solved.d them to be solved.