The Politics of Constitutionalism: International Institutions and the Relationship Between Law and Politics

By:
To add a paper, Login.

Since the fall of the Berlin Wall there has been both noticeable optimism and anxiety for the future of international institutions. In European international legal scholarship in particular, there has been both a renewed hope to enhance international regulatory governance, influenced by regional and global economic integration, but also a fear of hegemonic abuse, perhaps taking advantage of fragmented, incoherent and unordered regimes and networks, or through institutional "capture" under abusive hegemonic domination. Scholars have reacted developing "constitutional" perspectives on international institutional governance: promising political restraint and political coherence; effective but hierarchical, limited governance. This offers a palliative to concern over depleted sovereignty, accountability in opposition to hegemony, and a normative, structural hierarchy in opposition to fragmented incoherency.
I take a critical stance to these claims, situating these aspirations as part of a perpetual liberal promise. A promise of a cosmopolitan future under the rule of law: lawyers looking inwards to Western tradition and offering a universally verifiable future: the idea of the Western state. This narrative is inseparable from international law’s “professional” transformation in the nineteenth century, where legal structures were interwoven with the terms of post-revolutionary domestic politics. The “constitutionalists” rely on two fatal suppositions, however. An ideological supposition of an imaginary international rule of law, secured by liberal elites through supranational governance, and a structural supposition, ignoring the schizophrenic nature of institutions as autonomous, functional entities, but also as agorae for political contestation - a necessary role which can give voice to the otherwise disenfranchised, giving direction to politics as a positive end in itself.


Keywords: International Law, International Relations, International Organizations, History, Political Ideology, Liberalism
Stream: Politics, Public Policy and Law
Presentation Type: Paper Presentation in English
Paper: Contrasting the moral reasoning abilities of private sector CPAs and federal government sector CPAs as measured by the DIT-2 instrument: An Empirical Investigation


Richard Collins

PhD Candidate and Graduate Tutor in Law, School of Law, University of Sheffield
Sheffield, Yorkshire, UK

I am currently in my second year as a PhD candidate at the University of Sheffield. I also work as a graduate tutor in public law at the University, and an Associate Lecturer in constitutional law at Sheffield Hallam University. My doctoral research is addressing the image of international institutions, and the tension of institutional autonomy within the United Nations – considering member-institution, law-politics relationships. My general research interests include the theory and history of public international law, political and legal constitutional theory, the law of international organisations, peacekeeping and post-conflict reconstruction. Other departmental responsibilities include participating and helping to organise the research activities of Sheffield’s Centre for Law in its International Context (CLIC) and coordinating the law school’s weekly Graduate Research Colloquia. My other interests include music, art and European history.

Ref: I08P0699