The Accounting Discipline: Case Study Analyses of the Self-Image, Goal Orientation, Publication Practices and Social Connectedness of Academic Accountants

To add a paper, Login.

This paper begins with a review of the epistemological and sociological features of accounting. Accounting is seen to be a discipline whose knowledge is functional and utilitarian in nature, which is practice-oriented, which does not have a single dominant paradigm, which has a low level of theoretical consensus and a high level of disagreement over research methods, and which lacks a strong research tradition. The nature of accounting suggests that academic accountants as individuals may be pragmatic and business-oriented, that they have a penchant for counting and measuring, that they are comfortable with performance assessment and that they prefer to communicate knowledge rather than to search for it. Limited studies on psychological differences among American academics depict academic accountants as conservative, conformist, conventional, and as having stereotyped and simplistic views of the world. The explicit manipulation of data, records, or written material is within their domain, and money represents an important expression of their values. In researching, academic accountants use a range of methodologies, favour positivism, and tend to work alone rather than to collaborate. They value publishing in scholarly and professional journals; articles in the former tend to be lengthy and may take several years to reach publication stage. They have strong links with the professional accounting associations. Using case studies of four university accounting departments, the paper also explores four discipline-related analytical themes identified in the literature: self-image; goal orientation; forms and rates of publication; and social connectedness. Overall, the discipline themes assist in understanding workplace culture in academic accounting departments, as well as to make sense of the reactions of academic accountants to enforced change affecting work practices, values and beliefs. Any government policy which strikes at the heart of these fundamentals is likely to be resisted, as is any government imperative which threatens those things which accountants hold most dear—such as the primacy of teaching, and strong links with the profession including writing for professional journals. Add to this the disposition of academic accountants to think and behave in particular ways—conforming, conventional, stereotypical, constricted, simple and dependent—and the reactions of accounting staff to externally-imposed change begin to make sense.

Keywords: Nature of Accounting Discipline, Accounting's Impact on Academic Accountants, Culture of Academic Departments
Stream: Sociology, Geography
Presentation Type: Paper Presentation in English
Paper: A paper has not yet been submitted.

Prof. Sheila Bellamy

Professor, School of Accounting and Law, RMIT University
Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

I have been a member of staff in RMIT University's School of Accounting and Law since 1983. At RMIT I have held the positions of Head of School (10 years) and, most recently, Pro Vice-Chancellor (Business). I have served on numerous boards and committees at all levels of the University. I have now returned to the School to concentrate on my research. My research interests lie in the area of public sector and not-for-profit (NFP)accounting, on which I have published fairly extensively. I also have a strong interest in workplace culture in universities, and completed a major research project in the topic of this paper. My main teaching area is Accounting Theory. I serve on a number of NFP external boards.

Ref: I08P0735